Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Fixes #128799.

As discussed with @fmease, they have a broader patch in progress, so this (small) PR will at least allow for them to have a regression test. :)

r? @fmease

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 10, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 10, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs

cc @camelid

@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Aug 10, 2024

Thanks! @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 10, 2024

📌 Commit 5baf7c2 has been approved by fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 10, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128273 (Improve `Ord` violation help)
 - rust-lang#128807 (run-make: explaing why fmt-write-bloat is ignore-windows)
 - rust-lang#128903 (rustdoc-json-types `Discriminant`: fix typo)
 - rust-lang#128905 (gitignore: Add Zed and Helix editors)
 - rust-lang#128908 (diagnostics: do not warn when a lifetime bound infers itself)
 - rust-lang#128909 (Fix dump-ice-to-disk for RUSTC_ICE=0 users)
 - rust-lang#128910 (Differentiate between methods and associated functions in diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#128923 ([rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
trait_,
rendering_params,
);
if !impl_.is_negative_trait_impl() {
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease Aug 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From what I remember this check shouldn't actually be necessary contrary to the one further down but since this is temporary, it's fine.

I will elaborate on that in my upcoming PR.

@bors bors merged commit 893b9f3 into rust-lang:master Aug 10, 2024
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128923 - GuillaumeGomez:negative-impls-items, r=fmease

[rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls

Fixes rust-lang#128799.

As discussed with `@fmease,` they have a broader patch in progress, so this (small) PR will at least allow for them to have a regression test. :)

r? `@fmease`
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Aug 10, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the negative-impls-items branch August 10, 2024 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rustdoc should not render associated items of a negative impl
4 participants